Australia v New Zealand
Moderators: Randoman, Ernie Cooksey, Forum Admins
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Australia v New Zealand
More hypocrisy already.
1. All we have heard over the last few years is that England play non English people now we have Khawaja playing again.
2. Australians whingeing about the pitches not being good enough then produce a pitch for the kiwis practice game that was so bad they refused to bat.
3. Kiwis said this morning that they were desperate to win the toss and bat. It's almost like a wicket has been produced that will favour one team. Some may call that "doctoring".
1. All we have heard over the last few years is that England play non English people now we have Khawaja playing again.
2. Australians whingeing about the pitches not being good enough then produce a pitch for the kiwis practice game that was so bad they refused to bat.
3. Kiwis said this morning that they were desperate to win the toss and bat. It's almost like a wicket has been produced that will favour one team. Some may call that "doctoring".
- Stitch This
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 11903
- Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 3:51 pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
Apparently Australia not beaten in a Test at the Gabba in over 20 years.God is an Englishman wrote:More hypocrisy already.
1. All we have heard over the last few years is that England play non English people now we have Khawaja playing again.
2. Australians whingeing about the pitches not being good enough then produce a pitch for the kiwis practice game that was so bad they refused to bat.
3. Kiwis said this morning that they were desperate to win the toss and bat. It's almost like a wicket has been produced that will favour one team. Some may call that "doctoring".
Time for some righteous indignation
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60529
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
1. One or two players over a long period as opposed to half a team over a long period
2. They've played plenty cricket over here already, so they missed the equivalent of couple days worth of rain, big deal
3. And if NZ did win the toss and batted, how would that be "doctoring" or favouring the home side?
Feeble attempt, even by your standards. Oh, and good luck against Pakistan.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
1. So it's OK to do as long as there's not too many. It's either wrong or it's OK.Bomber wrote:
1. One or two players over a long period as opposed to half a team over a long period
2. They've played plenty cricket over here already, so they missed the equivalent of couple days worth of rain, big deal
3. And if NZ did win the toss and batted, how would that be "doctoring" or favouring the home side?
Feeble attempt, even by your standards. Oh, and good luck against Pakistan.
2. Schedules are produced for a reason and you lot couldn't even be decent enough to give them batting practice.
3. It wouldn't, but a pitch produced that favoured whoever batted first. Doesn't sound like a balanced wicket to me. Once again, Aussies doing exactly what they'd complained about in the past.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60529
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
1. Relying on foreigners to do most of the work - I thought that was generally speaking in UK, but not in sport.God is an Englishman wrote:1. So it's OK to do as long as there's not too many. It's either wrong or it's OK.Bomber wrote:
1. One or two players over a long period as opposed to half a team over a long period
2. They've played plenty cricket over here already, so they missed the equivalent of couple days worth of rain, big deal
3. And if NZ did win the toss and batted, how would that be "doctoring" or favouring the home side?
Feeble attempt, even by your standards. Oh, and good luck against Pakistan.
2. Schedules are produced for a reason and you lot couldn't even be decent enough to give them batting practice.
3. It wouldn't, but a pitch produced that favoured whoever batted first. Doesn't sound like a balanced wicket to me. Once again, Aussies doing exactly what they'd complained about in the past.
2. Did NZ get batting practice since they arrived? Yes or no
3. Is this pitch unlike any other recent Gabba wicket?
You're the only one whingeing (yet again) by the way.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
1. well you don't have an empire if you can't make them earn their keep. Or in more recent times, why wouldn't you hire a pole who will do it at a fraction of the price. YET, once again australia are claiming someone who isn't australian whilst whingeing about others doing it.Bomber wrote:
1. Relying on foreigners to do most of the work - I thought that was generally speaking in UK, but not in sport.
2. Did NZ get batting practice since they arrived? Yes or no
3. Is this pitch unlike any other recent Gabba wicket?
You're the only one whingeing (yet again) by the way.
2. Yes, but clearly not enough as they "prepared" a dangerous wicket.
3. I haven't looked at it but it's clearly been set up to for batting to be easier early on. Not the same for both sides - in previous times australia have whinged like little girls when this has happened to them.
AND it's not whingeing, I've merely pointed out the hypocrisy.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60529
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
You really have a big imagination then because that's all bollocks. Seriously, you need therapy. These nasty Aussies are really getting to you.God is an Englishman wrote:1. well you don't have an empire if you can't make them earn their keep. Or in more recent times, why wouldn't you hire a pole who will do it at a fraction of the price. YET, once again australia are claiming someone who isn't australian whilst whingeing about others doing it.Bomber wrote:
1. Relying on foreigners to do most of the work - I thought that was generally speaking in UK, but not in sport.
2. Did NZ get batting practice since they arrived? Yes or no
3. Is this pitch unlike any other recent Gabba wicket?
You're the only one whingeing (yet again) by the way.
2. Yes, but clearly not enough as they "prepared" a dangerous wicket.
3. I haven't looked at it but it's clearly been set up to for batting to be easier early on. Not the same for both sides - in previous times australia have whinged like little girls when this has happened to them.
AND it's not whingeing, I've merely pointed out the hypocrisy.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
That's why no away team has ever won a series in the Emirates. Maybe i should complain about the pitch being doctored.Bomber wrote:FixedGod is an Englishman wrote:None so english as those who cannot stop whingeing
Bad luck with Pakistan btw.
Re: Australia v New Zealand
brave statement after seeing the first session off. Most of the kiwis I heard were quite confident of picking up a few wickets with how sticky it was this morning, well done nostredamusN5 1BH wrote:aussies won the toss and surprise, surprise chose to bat. So when's the next test then ?
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60529
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
One day the penny might drop about the difference when a cricket board and/or captain orders a particular type of wicket, as opposed to whatever the groundsman simply and usually prepares.God is an Englishman wrote:That's why no away team has ever won a series in the Emirates. Maybe i should complain about the pitch being doctored.Bomber wrote:FixedGod is an Englishman wrote:None so english as those who cannot stop whingeing
Bad luck with Pakistan btw.
Was funny when I checked on the game at the Emirates the other day and saw Rashid and Patel at the crease. I thought Pakistan were batting. I was wrong! Might be time to revisit whether any decent young saffers have a great great English uncle again........
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
How do you know what was ordered by the board in England or in Australia?
Do you mean Rashid from Bradford and Patel from Leicester? Any idea where Khawaja is from?
Do you mean Rashid from Bradford and Patel from Leicester? Any idea where Khawaja is from?
- Urgh! A Musíc War
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:04 am
Re: Australia v New Zealand
Canterbury Bankstown??
* I don't know... that was just a stab in the dark.
* I don't know... that was just a stab in the dark.
I hate screaming kids
Re: Australia v New Zealand
It seems that the Cricket Australia XI were trying to do them a favour by giving them bowling practice. It would seem, to me, that they needed it.
-
- Team Manager
- Posts: 8891
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:43 pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 89 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
God is an Englishman
How do you know what was ordered by the board in England or in Australia?
so you accept that there was an order to doctor but youre not sure what it was???
“Hence, we will not say that Greeks fight like heroes, but that heroes fight like Greeks." Winston Churchill
- Urgh! A Musíc War
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:04 am
Re: Australia v New Zealand
I don't think he has ever denied that wickets are prepared to favor the home side.
I hate screaming kids
- Moritaka Chisato
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 2:41 pm
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
that statement shows nothing about me saying there was an order.MegaBonus wrote:God is an Englishman
How do you know what was ordered by the board in England or in Australia?
so you accept that there was an order to doctor but youre not sure what it was???
However, I believe all countries produce wickets to help themselves. It's called home advantage
Last edited by God is an Englishman on Fri Nov 06, 2015 2:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Urgh! A Musíc War
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:04 am
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
It is to someUrgh! A Musíc War wrote:Of course they do. It's not rocket science.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60529
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
Might want to explain why most of our test pitches are so different then.God is an Englishman wrote:It is to someUrgh! A Musíc War wrote:Of course they do. It's not rocket science.
Ignore this signature
- Moritaka Chisato
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 2:41 pm
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
Bomber wrote:Might want to explain why most of our test pitches are so different then.God is an Englishman wrote:It is to someUrgh! A Musíc War wrote:Of course they do. It's not rocket science.
are they? all are pretty hard and bouncy and good for pace bowlers. All are set up to generally be good for batsmen early on, good for spinners late on...
If the pitches were how they naturally were then who is cutting the grass? who is rolling the pitch? who is watering the pitch?
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 3444
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:17 pm
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 68 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
Not being blinded by parochialism does not necessarily make one a visionary however I can see how an australian could have trouble differentiating.Steve#4 wrote:brave statement after seeing the first session off. Most of the kiwis I heard were quite confident of picking up a few wickets with how sticky it was this morning, well done nostredamusN5 1BH wrote:aussies won the toss and surprise, surprise chose to bat. So when's the next test then ?
- Urgh! A Musíc War
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:04 am
Re: Australia v New Zealand
New Zealand have now lost more wickets than Australia.
I hate screaming kids
Re: Australia v New Zealand
I saw kiwis at the start of the game thinking they had a great shot bowling.N5 1BH wrote:Not being blinded by parochialism does not necessarily make one a visionary however I can see how an australian could have trouble differentiating.Steve#4 wrote:brave statement after seeing the first session off. Most of the kiwis I heard were quite confident of picking up a few wickets with how sticky it was this morning, well done nostredamusN5 1BH wrote:aussies won the toss and surprise, surprise chose to bat. So when's the next test then ?
I see also a pom that waited till after lunch because he didnt have the conviction, then take a cheap shot.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
How shit must NZ be if they've let Warner get 100 in both innings and burns to a ton as well.
Only a year ago they drew with England. Maybe the deck suits Australia better.
Only a year ago they drew with England. Maybe the deck suits Australia better.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times