One dayers

PDog · Post by **PDog** » Wed Jan 21, 2015 8:30 am

God is an Englishman wrote:What a win today, totally dominant performance.

an absolute flogging...

Delete Your Account · Post by **Delete Your Account** » Wed Jan 21, 2015 8:31 am

Dunno how Binny wasn't MoM... important innings in the context of the game.

God is an Englishman · Wed Jan 21, 2015 9:53 am

Slinky_Pete wrote:Dunno how Binny wasn't MoM... important innings in the context of the game.

Someone got DOUBLE the amount of runs and another person got 5 times the amount of wickets.

Nice try though

swannsong · Post by **swannsong** » Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:41 pm

PDog wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:What a win today, totally dominant performance.
an absolute flogging...

I think Warner may have softened the Indians up for England

God is an Englishman · Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:28 am

swannsong wrote:
PDog wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:What a win today, totally dominant performance.
an absolute flogging...
I think Warner may have softened the Indians up for England

That midget couldn't soften up Joe Root.

Anyone notice that England played India in good spirits, Kohli walked off the pitch having a friendly chat with Bell at "lunch".

Bomber · Post by **Bomber** » Thu Jan 22, 2015 10:57 am

Softcox generally mix with their own

Stitch This · Post by **Stitch This** » Thu Jan 22, 2015 11:53 am

Bomber wrote:Softcox generally mix with their own

KP looked pretty soft last night.

God is an Englishman · Thu Jan 22, 2015 11:59 am

Stitch This wrote:
Bomber wrote:Softcox generally mix with their own
KP looked pretty soft last night.

Who's the leading run scorer in the BBL this year?

Stitch This · Post by **Stitch This** » Thu Jan 22, 2015 1:04 pm

Pity he let it go to his head.

God is an Englishman · Thu Jan 22, 2015 4:22 pm

Stitch This wrote:Pity he let it go to his head.

I'd take one bad innings in a game where they needed 12 an over for a home final and being the leading run scorer.

predator · Post by **predator** » Fri Jan 23, 2015 12:01 am

God is an Englishman wrote:
Anyone notice that England played India in good spirits

No

God is an Englishman · Fri Jan 23, 2015 1:06 pm

predator wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:
Anyone notice that England played India in good spirits
No

Didn't watch the game then as even the commentators made comments about it.

Delete Your Account · Post by **Delete Your Account** » Fri Jan 23, 2015 1:27 pm

God is an Englishman wrote:
predator wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:
Anyone notice that England played India in good spirits
No
Didn't watch the game then as even the commentators made comments about it.

Hardly anyone does, that's why they put it on GEM

God is an Englishman · Fri Jan 23, 2015 2:54 pm

Slinky_Pete wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote: Didn't watch the game then as even the commentators made comments about it.
Hardly anyone does, that's why they put it on GEM

Yes, but he claims to be English

predator · Post by **predator** » Fri Jan 23, 2015 6:56 pm

God is an Englishman wrote:
predator wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:
Anyone notice that England played India in good spirits
No
Didn't watch the game then as even the commentators made comments about it.

I watch multiple sports all at once, i can't have commentary going on all of them, and definitely don't want to hear comments regarding the mug on the right hand screen

God is an Englishman · Fri Jan 23, 2015 8:06 pm

He's my favourite current England cricketer, a legend.

God is an Englishman · Fri Jan 23, 2015 9:01 pm

Where's Moses Henriques from?

God is an Englishman · Fri Jan 23, 2015 9:30 pm

Even you lot are going to see my point when Bell doesn't get man of the match in this one.

Great run chase by the cons, those lean overs in the last 10 have cost us.

Bomber · Post by **Bomber** » Fri Jan 23, 2015 11:35 pm

God is an Englishman wrote:Even you lot are going to see my point when Bell doesn't get man of the match in this one.

Great run chase by the cons, those lean overs in the last 10 have cost us.

You seem hell bent on MOM awards these days, rather than the result. I can refer you to a therapist if needed.............she's cheap......and comes with decent benefits.............

God is an Englishman · Sat Jan 24, 2015 5:22 am

Bomber wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:Even you lot are going to see my point when Bell doesn't get man of the match in this one.

Great run chase by the cons, those lean overs in the last 10 have cost us.
You seem hell bent on MOM awards these days, rather than the result. I can refer you to a therapist if needed.............she's cheap......and comes with decent benefits.............

I mention the great run chase what more do you want. It just pisses me off that the cons can't see what's in front of them. The game's about team not the individual but Bell was the clear MOM yesterday.

Bomber · Post by **Bomber** » Sat Jan 24, 2015 3:23 pm

God is an Englishman wrote:
Bomber wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:Even you lot are going to see my point when Bell doesn't get man of the match in this one.

Great run chase by the cons, those lean overs in the last 10 have cost us.
You seem hell bent on MOM awards these days, rather than the result. I can refer you to a therapist if needed.............she's cheap......and comes with decent benefits.............
I mention the great run chase what more do you want. It just pisses me off that the cons can't see what's in front of them. The game's about team not the individual but Bell was the clear MOM yesterday.

Player of the match doesnt always have to mean highest run scorer or wicket taker. I liken it more to who had most influence in the game.

Anyway, a reasonable hit out for our reserves

God is an Englishman · Sun Jan 25, 2015 1:19 am

I do agree, which is why in our first game it was clearly Morgan.

I would have understood Haddin more than the Sevenoaks vine reject in round 2

Stitch This · Post by **Stitch This** » Sun Feb 01, 2015 9:14 pm

Was there even a game on today?

The Bourne Supremacy · Sun Feb 01, 2015 9:54 pm

Yes, but only one side turned up. Actually make it half a side.

God is an Englishman · Mon Feb 02, 2015 7:53 am

The Bourne Supremacy wrote:Yes, but only one side turned up. Actually make it half a side.

Both sides had their bowlers turn up.

Bomber · Post by **Bomber** » Mon Feb 02, 2015 9:06 am

So what was it this time - umpiring? Warner talking too much? Sub fielder took too many catches?

Cant believe Woakes didn't get man of the match!

Old Redback · Post by **Old Redback** » Mon Feb 02, 2015 9:13 am

Bomber wrote:So what was it this time - umpiring? Warner talking too much? Sub fielder took too many catches?

Cant believe Woakes didn't get man of the match!

I think from recent history moaning about a sub fielder has been more of an Australian trait.

Bomber · Post by **Bomber** » Mon Feb 02, 2015 9:15 am

Old Redback wrote:
Bomber wrote:So what was it this time - umpiring? Warner talking too much? Sub fielder took too many catches?

Cant believe Woakes didn't get man of the match!
I think from recent history moaning about a sub fielder has been more of an Australian trait.

More recently its been a Hawkesy whinge.

Black_Panther · Post by **Black_Panther** » Mon Feb 02, 2015 9:23 am

Did Morgan really say that the POMs aren't afraid of Johnson anymore?

Stitch This · Post by **Stitch This** » Mon Feb 02, 2015 9:41 am

God is an Englishman wrote:Both sides had their bowlers turn up.

James Faulkner wrote:hi

Home | Forums | Photos | Video | Blog | About | Contact

One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers

Re: One dayers