I thought the split with crna gora was going to make you stronger? More unity, your own anthem, actual serb colours...those were the excuses used for your poor performances in the WC.
Make sure you wear your red stars proudly when marching!
Gee, reading below really makes you wonder why it is you serbs actually march...official Commonwealth Govt link provided. You and your "marchers" are a faaarking joke.
10 Commonwealth Government to Cranborne
Cablegram 12 CANBERRA, 11 January 1944
MOST SECRET
The Australian Government has been following closely your recent
telegrams on the situation in Yugoslavia, Greece and Italy and
much appreciates detailed advice of developments.
2. In general we fear that unless great care is taken Allies may
lay themselves open to the charge of endeavouring to return to the
pre war status quo in these countries and bolstering up old
regimes to which the majority of the populations concerned are
violently opposed.
3. YUGOSLAVIA
We fully realise the desirability of preserving the State of
Yugoslavia as an independent entity although all the trends are in
the direction of a loose-knit confederation consisting of at least
three and possibly five or six units.
At the same time we are extremely doubtful whether continued
British backing of the King of Yugoslavia [1] will help towards
Yugoslav unity. In this connection we note in particular the views
expressed by the Head of the British Military Mission to the
Partisan Movement [2], and the British Ambassador to the Yugoslav
Government [3] (D.O. tele gram 1182 of 27th December [4]) that
'the dynasty would not be a unifying factor in Yugoslavia and its
return would be bitterly opposed by the majority of the nation',
that 'the King has been personally discredited in the eyes of the
Partisans', and that 'he is irreparably compromised with the
Partisans and a sudden volte face on his part at this stage would
not affect their attitude'.
With regard to General Mihailovitch [5] we have noted particularly
your telegram (D.1062 of 6th December [6]) giving your analysis of
his position stating that he 'is not only of no military value to
the Allies but has also become a standing obstacle to any sort of
Yugoslav unity either now or in the near future'; and also Mr.
Churchill's statement to the King of Yugoslavia on 10th December
that 'we had irrefutable evidence that General Mihailovitch was
collaborating with the enemy'.
In the light of these views it seems to us that the time has come
to withdraw support finally from Mihailovitch and to consider very
serious ly whether it should not also be withdrawn from the King
and Government, henceforward concentrating support on Tito [7] and
his National Committee and allowing the question regarding the
monarchy to stand over for decision by the Yugoslav people after
the war. in particular we feel that it would be ineffective and
imprudent to send the King to Tito's headquarters.
http://www.info.dfat.gov.au/info/histor ... 7E001E46D5