This forum is for discussion of other sports.
Moderators: Randoman, Ernie Cooksey, Forum Admins
-
bapa
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 17837
- Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 11:08 am
Post
by bapa »
Miyuki wrote:So you're saying English women are superior to Australian women?
no, not even close.
But Liz Hurley is a stunner!
-
God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Post
by God is an Englishman »
bubu wrote:God is an Englishman wrote:Why have you made NEVER ACCUSED so large? As I said he was accused MANY times.
And the druggie chucker is shagging an English bird, and...
Or CONVICTED!!!!
The English language isn't your strong point is it, you've made my point for me.
-
God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Post
by God is an Englishman »
bubu wrote:Miyuki wrote:So you're saying English women are superior to Australian women?
no, not even close.
But Liz Hurley is a stunner!
she's about your age bracket I suppose.
-
bapa
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 17837
- Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 11:08 am
Post
by bapa »
God is an Englishman wrote:bubu wrote:Miyuki wrote:So you're saying English women are superior to Australian women?
no, not even close.
But Liz Hurley is a stunner!
she's about your age bracket I suppose.
nope, she was born in the decade before me, but what a MILF!
-
bapa
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 17837
- Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 11:08 am
Post
by bapa »
God is an Englishman wrote:bubu wrote:God is an Englishman wrote:Why have you made NEVER ACCUSED so large? As I said he was accused MANY times.
And the druggie chucker is shagging an English bird, and...
Or CONVICTED!!!!
The English language isn't your strong point is it, you've made my point for me.
oh dear...
Many call u a d
ikhead and a whinging twat on here does it mean u are???
its one thing to be accused, its another to be convicted
-
God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Post
by God is an Englishman »
bubu wrote:oh dear...
Many call u a d
ikhead and a whinging twat on here does it mean u are???
its one thing to be accused, its another to be convicted
but you said, he'd never been accused. He has MANY times.
-
Miyuki
- Apprentice
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 3:31 pm
Post
by Miyuki »
God is an Englishman wrote:but you said, he'd never been accused. He has MANY times.
Whilst you are correct, it means little when you consider with whom your are arguing.
As always deadlines to meet.
-
bapa
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 17837
- Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 11:08 am
Post
by bapa »
Miyuki wrote:God is an Englishman wrote:but you said, he'd never been accused. He has MANY times.
Whilst you are correct, it means little when you consider with whom your are arguing.
oh bodo, if only u could post under 1 username.......
once again, ur opinion dont matter so why dont u go go annoy someone else!!!!
u twat
-
bapa
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 17837
- Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 11:08 am
Post
by bapa »
God is an Englishman wrote:bubu wrote:oh dear...
Many call u a d
ikhead and a whinging twat on here does it mean u are???
its one thing to be accused, its another to be convicted
but you said, he'd never been accused. He has MANY times.
u said he has been convicted, yet u can't prove to me that he has!
thats cos HE HAS NEVER BEEN CONVICTED!
nice to see u havent answered my question, how typical of u
-
God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Post
by God is an Englishman »
bubu wrote:God is an Englishman wrote:bubu wrote:oh dear...
Many call u a d
ikhead and a whinging twat on here does it mean u are???
its one thing to be accused, its another to be convicted
but you said, he'd never been accused. He has MANY times.
u said he has been convicted, yet u can't prove to me that he has!
thats cos HE HAS NEVER BEEN CONVICTED!
nice to see u havent answered my question, how typical of u
I assumed it to be a rhetorical question.
When did I say he had been convicted?
-
Kojima Haruna
- Boot Polisher
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2013 4:06 am
Post
by Kojima Haruna »
bubu wrote:oh bodo, if only u could post under 1 username.......
Says the guy who has also post under many usernames. Who is this u you keep talking about?
At some stage things stop being cool
-
Rookie
- Star Player
- Posts: 2758
- Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:03 am
- Has thanked: 37 times
- Been thanked: 33 times
Post
by Rookie »
sephiroth wrote:how about the LOTG were changed to allow Murali to keep playing?
THIS
-
Ernie Cooksey
- Star Player
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 11:33 am
Post
by Ernie Cooksey »
I remember Tony Grieg trying to bend Murali's arm straight. Couldn't do it.
-
God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Post
by God is an Englishman »
Rookie wrote:sephiroth wrote:how about the LOTG were changed to allow Murali to keep playing?
THIS
Was shane warne called for chucking under the new or the old laws?