Answers please?

This forum is for the discussion of amateur league football.

Moderators: BillShankly, John Cena, swannsong, Forum Admins

Post Reply
PASC
First Team Regular
First Team Regular
Posts: 2011
Joined: Fri May 20, 2011 10:30 am

Re: Answers please?

Post by PASC »

PASC wrote:
ZegnaArmani wrote:
POLONIAROCS wrote:Has Polonia received an official reply from the league?
Are all results standing and will Ghan be named champion of Div 4A / B?
Still no word. Should have something this afternoon I believe.

* Edit: Letter was posted a couple of days ago apparently - someone just needs to read it now! :lol:
there is an earlier protest still pending no matter what this letter says
God is an Englishman wrote: As for me being a tosser on this forum, it's not just on the forum. I'm a tosser in real life as well.
User avatar
bomber Harris
Boot Polisher
Boot Polisher
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:40 pm

Re: Answers please?

Post by bomber Harris »

This is a total joke on the leagues behalf. :clown: :clown:

No fuck'n Balls, the games dead here with total Div's running the show.
Time these old Buggas thought about why they are in the positions there in , which is for the good of ALL clubs & the sport, & not about them. Fuck'n crooks,
As mentioned, clubs affected by this, should stick together & boycott playing these types of teams that make a mockery of the game.
"We Fear No Foe"
gone
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 2489
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: Answers please?

Post by gone »

bomber Harris wrote:This is a total joke on the leagues behalf. :clown: :clown:

No shiraz'n Balls, the games dead here with total Div's running the show.
Time these old Buggas thought about why they are in the positions there in , which is for the good of ALL clubs & the sport, & not about them. shiraz'n crooks,
As mentioned, clubs affected by this, should stick together & boycott playing these types of teams that make a mockery of the game.
Toys thrown well out of the pram on this one. I've not seen a dummy spat this far for some time.

Please don't go asking SAASL to interfere with results, to pick and choose which results they'll overturn, disregarding the referees report. Or are you going to be the final arbiter, who decides which results they like and which ones they don't?

"these types of teams"? Be careful, your racism is showing.
Do you mean "muslims"? That's already been debunked.
Maybe you mean "migrants"? Try telling that to any of the Greek, Italian, Polish, or whatever clubs.
But probably you mean "refugee communities"? People want the refugee communities to make the effort to integrate into Australian society, then you want to stop them from playing sport with you. Nice.

By all means boycott teams that physically assault people, but not this.
Stirling District (est 1967) 32 seasons successfully avoiding a Championship then this
1999 Div 2 Champions
2002 Div 2 & 2B
2004 Div 1 & Champion of Champions
2007 Div 1 & 1B
2009 Div 1B
2011 Div 1B
2013 Div 2B & 7C
2014 Div 2B
User avatar
God is an Englishman
Board Member
Board Member
Posts: 51452
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 85 times

Re: Answers please?

Post by God is an Englishman »

otto62 wrote:
bomber Harris wrote:This is a total joke on the leagues behalf. :clown: :clown:

No shiraz'n Balls, the games dead here with total Div's running the show.
Time these old Buggas thought about why they are in the positions there in , which is for the good of ALL clubs & the sport, & not about them. shiraz'n crooks,
As mentioned, clubs affected by this, should stick together & boycott playing these types of teams that make a mockery of the game.
Toys thrown well out of the pram on this one. I've not seen a dummy spat this far for some time.

Please don't go asking SAASL to interfere with results, to pick and choose which results they'll overturn, disregarding the referees report. Or are you going to be the final arbiter, who decides which results they like and which ones they don't?

"these types of teams"? Be careful, your racism is showing.
Do you mean "muslims"? That's already been debunked.
Maybe you mean "migrants"? Try telling that to any of the Greek, Italian, Polish, or whatever clubs.
But probably you mean "refugee communities"? People want the refugee communities to make the effort to integrate into Australian society, then you want to stop them from playing sport with you. Nice.

By all means boycott teams that physically assault people, but not this.

I think you're reading racism that isn't there on this one.

these types of teams that make a mockery of the game.

to me I read, these teams to the teams that make a mockery of the game and in no way mentions race, immigrants and refugees.
Image
gone
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 2489
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: Answers please?

Post by gone »

God is an Englishman wrote: I think you're reading racism that isn't there on this one.

these types of teams that make a mockery of the game.

to me I read, these teams to the teams that make a mockery of the game and in no way mentions race, immigrants and refugees.
I hope you're right, and if so I withdraw my comment and apologise.
However saying "these types of teams that ..." indicates that there is a "type" of team that makes a mockery.
Stirling District (est 1967) 32 seasons successfully avoiding a Championship then this
1999 Div 2 Champions
2002 Div 2 & 2B
2004 Div 1 & Champion of Champions
2007 Div 1 & 1B
2009 Div 1B
2011 Div 1B
2013 Div 2B & 7C
2014 Div 2B
User avatar
bomber Harris
Boot Polisher
Boot Polisher
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:40 pm

Re: Answers please?

Post by bomber Harris »

otto62 wrote:
bomber Harris wrote:This is a total joke on the leagues behalf. :clown: :clown:

No shiraz'n Balls, the games dead here with total Div's running the show.
Time these old Buggas thought about why they are in the positions there in , which is for the good of ALL clubs & the sport, & not about them. shiraz'n crooks,
As mentioned, clubs affected by this, should stick together & boycott playing these types of teams that make a mockery of the game.
Toys thrown well out of the pram on this one. I've not seen a dummy spat this far for some time.

Please don't go asking SAASL to interfere with results, to pick and choose which results they'll overturn, disregarding the referees report. Or are you going to be the final arbiter, who decides which results they like and which ones they don't?

"these types of teams"? Be careful, your racism is showing.
Do you mean "muslims"? That's already been debunked.
Maybe you mean "migrants"? Try telling that to any of the Greek, Italian, Polish, or whatever clubs.
But probably you mean "refugee communities"? People want the refugee communities to make the effort to integrate into Australian society, then you want to stop them from playing sport with you. Nice.

By all means boycott teams that physically assault people, but not this.
You my son are a total fuck'n tool!
Why do people throw up the racist card every fuck'n time it happens to be a different Communty that may be involved in something.
I was on about the 2 clubs , teams what ever you want to call them, making a fuck'n mug of the League, & the League doing fuck all as usual.I don't condone ANY club doing the shit that has gone on in Div 4! Make the game a joke.
Thats the problem, cunts like you sit on the fence & pull the fuck'n racist card every time different natanalities are spoken about. Fuck'n Mug, jog on.
"We Fear No Foe"
User avatar
bomber Harris
Boot Polisher
Boot Polisher
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:40 pm

Re: Answers please?

Post by bomber Harris »

otto62 wrote:
bomber Harris wrote:This is a total joke on the leagues behalf. :clown: :clown:

No shiraz'n Balls, the games dead here with total Div's running the show.
Time these old Buggas thought about why they are in the positions there in , which is for the good of ALL clubs & the sport, & not about them. shiraz'n crooks,
As mentioned, clubs affected by this, should stick together & boycott playing these types of teams that make a mockery of the game.
Toys thrown well out of the pram on this one. I've not seen a dummy spat this far for some time.

Please don't go asking SAASL to interfere with results, to pick and choose which results they'll overturn, disregarding the referees report. Or are you going to be the final arbiter, who decides which results they like and which ones they don't?

"these types of teams"? Be careful, your racism is showing.
Do you mean "muslims"? That's already been debunked.
Maybe you mean "migrants"? Try telling that to any of the Greek, Italian, Polish, or whatever clubs.
But probably you mean "refugee communities"? People want the refugee communities to make the effort to integrate into Australian society, then you want to stop them from playing sport with you. Nice.

By all means boycott teams that physically assault people, but not this.
I'll be at the Modbury game today, if you would like to discuss my racist views as YOU put it! Fuck'n Mug!!
"We Fear No Foe"
Jonesy5
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 128
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 8:49 am

Re: Answers please?

Post by Jonesy5 »

Well this escalated quickly...
Not so special one
Boot Polisher
Boot Polisher
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 2:46 pm

Re: Answers please?

Post by Not so special one »

Just had the pleasure of watching a game between Modbury Jets & Stirling & this is what SAASL is all about. I really hope that Polonia have enough evidence to get their result against The Ghan reversed so that we at Payneham Postel can also get out of this league where we have to play an almost full Federation team one week & 2 weeks later the same team loses 28-4.
gone
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 2489
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: Answers please?

Post by gone »

bomber Harris wrote:
otto62 wrote:
bomber Harris wrote:This is a total joke on the leagues behalf. :clown: :clown:

No shiraz'n Balls, the games dead here with total Div's running the show.
Time these old Buggas thought about why they are in the positions there in , which is for the good of ALL clubs & the sport, & not about them. shiraz'n crooks,
As mentioned, clubs affected by this, should stick together & boycott playing these types of teams that make a mockery of the game.
Toys thrown well out of the pram on this one. I've not seen a dummy spat this far for some time.

Please don't go asking SAASL to interfere with results, to pick and choose which results they'll overturn, disregarding the referees report. Or are you going to be the final arbiter, who decides which results they like and which ones they don't?

"these types of teams"? Be careful, your racism is showing.
Do you mean "muslims"? That's already been debunked.
Maybe you mean "migrants"? Try telling that to any of the Greek, Italian, Polish, or whatever clubs.
But probably you mean "refugee communities"? People want the refugee communities to make the effort to integrate into Australian society, then you want to stop them from playing sport with you. Nice.

By all means boycott teams that physically assault people, but not this.
I'll be at the Modbury game today, if you would like to discuss my racist views as YOU put it! shiraz'n Mug!!
Were you giving the two fingered salute, the extended index finger, or the fist pumping 'f@ck you' at the end of the game in front of your kids? Or maybe you were one of the men watching?
Stirling District (est 1967) 32 seasons successfully avoiding a Championship then this
1999 Div 2 Champions
2002 Div 2 & 2B
2004 Div 1 & Champion of Champions
2007 Div 1 & 1B
2009 Div 1B
2011 Div 1B
2013 Div 2B & 7C
2014 Div 2B
gone
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 2489
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: Answers please?

Post by gone »

Not so special one wrote:Just had the pleasure of watching a game between Modbury Jets & Stirling & this is what SAASL is all about. I really hope that Polonia have enough evidence to get their result against The Ghan reversed so that we at Payneham Postel can also get out of this league where we have to play an almost full Federation team one week & 2 weeks later the same team loses 28-4.
I too hope that the Polonia evidence presented is sufficient for the league to reverse the Ghan result.
Stirling District (est 1967) 32 seasons successfully avoiding a Championship then this
1999 Div 2 Champions
2002 Div 2 & 2B
2004 Div 1 & Champion of Champions
2007 Div 1 & 1B
2009 Div 1B
2011 Div 1B
2013 Div 2B & 7C
2014 Div 2B
Not so special one
Boot Polisher
Boot Polisher
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 2:46 pm

Re: Answers please?

Post by Not so special one »

Lot better than chasing referees into change rooms, putting goalkeepers in hospital for 6 weeks, stomping on players heads if they happen to be on the ground, playing Federation players when you can. Is this Adelaide our city?
Whose rules are we playing to, SAASL or not?
User avatar
Spätlese
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 288
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 9:38 am

Re: Answers please?

Post by Spätlese »

otto62 wrote:I too hope that the Polonia evidence presented is sufficient for the league to reverse the Ghan result.
What evidence?
shiraz champagne.
User avatar
God is an Englishman
Board Member
Board Member
Posts: 51452
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 85 times

Re: Answers please?

Post by God is an Englishman »

otto62 wrote:Were you giving the two fingered salute, the extended index finger, or the fist pumping 'f@ck you' at the end of the game in front of your kids? Or maybe you were one of the men watching?

I think I was all of those except for the part of doing it in front of my kids.
Image
gone
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 2489
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: Answers please?

Post by gone »

God is an Englishman wrote:
otto62 wrote:Were you giving the two fingered salute, the extended index finger, or the fist pumping 'f@ck you' at the end of the game in front of your kids? Or maybe you were one of the men watching?

I think I was all of those except for the part of doing it in front of my kids.
You certainly earned the right to do it with a good hard fought win, to win the league.
Stirling District (est 1967) 32 seasons successfully avoiding a Championship then this
1999 Div 2 Champions
2002 Div 2 & 2B
2004 Div 1 & Champion of Champions
2007 Div 1 & 1B
2009 Div 1B
2011 Div 1B
2013 Div 2B & 7C
2014 Div 2B
POLONIAROCS
Bench Warmer
Bench Warmer
Posts: 679
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 7:20 pm

Re: Answers please?

Post by POLONIAROCS »

The league should make Polonia play Ghan at a netural venue to decide the winner of the 4A / B championship.

Get the league their to do a card check on both teams. SAASL to watch the games. Get 3 officials per game.

Best way to resolve this mess.
User avatar
Green Grass Rovers
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 155
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 11:41 pm

Re: Answers please?

Post by Green Grass Rovers »

No they shouldn't. In any event, head to head should take place before a playoff.
The Grass Is Greener On Our Side
THE ORAKLE
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 3299
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:50 pm

Re: Answers please?

Post by THE ORAKLE »

ontheblackburner wrote:sigh: berate these teams for their alleged actions but don't accuse them of these misdemeanors because of your stereotypical perceptions because of the colour of their skin. Seriously people, grow up.
venkys out you say. :wink: my my you are worse than me. venkys,indian owners of blackburn rovers. bring back steve keen. :lol:
THE ORAKLE
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 3299
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:50 pm

Re: Answers please?

Post by THE ORAKLE »

Not so special one wrote:Lot better than chasing referees into change rooms, putting goalkeepers in hospital for 6 weeks, stomping on players heads if they happen to be on the ground, playing Federation players when you can. Is this Adelaide our city?
Whose rules are we playing to, SAASL or not?
sharias rules. :roll:
gone
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 2489
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: Answers please?

Post by gone »

I wonder why I was so quick to call the racist card earlier? Obviously never any racist comments on here.
Stirling District (est 1967) 32 seasons successfully avoiding a Championship then this
1999 Div 2 Champions
2002 Div 2 & 2B
2004 Div 1 & Champion of Champions
2007 Div 1 & 1B
2009 Div 1B
2011 Div 1B
2013 Div 2B & 7C
2014 Div 2B
User avatar
Stitch This
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 11903
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 3:51 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Answers please?

Post by Stitch This »

THE ORAKLE wrote:sharias rules. :roll:
Ya just talking shiite ya knob
Time for some righteous indignation
THE ORAKLE
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 3299
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:50 pm

Re: Answers please?

Post by THE ORAKLE »

sundays forecast was a little sunni but mostly shi-ite. :wink:
THE ORAKLE
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 3299
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:50 pm

Re: Answers please?

Post by THE ORAKLE »

well its all gone quiet hasnt it. if that result is allowed to stand chickenowski and his kow towing cronies should hang their collective heads in shame. :(
Knight15
First Team Regular
First Team Regular
Posts: 1846
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 10:19 am

Re: Answers please?

Post by Knight15 »

otto62 wrote:
bomber Harris wrote:This is a total joke on the leagues behalf. :clown: :clown:

No shiraz'n Balls, the games dead here with total Div's running the show.
Time these old Buggas thought about why they are in the positions there in , which is for the good of ALL clubs & the sport, & not about them. shiraz'n crooks,
As mentioned, clubs affected by this, should stick together & boycott playing these types of teams that make a mockery of the game.
Toys thrown well out of the pram on this one. I've not seen a dummy spat this far for some time.

Please don't go asking SAASL to interfere with results, to pick and choose which results they'll overturn, disregarding the referees report. Or are you going to be the final arbiter, who decides which results they like and which ones they don't?

"these types of teams"? Be careful, your racism is showing.
Do you mean "muslims"? That's already been debunked.
Maybe you mean "migrants"? Try telling that to any of the Greek, Italian, Polish, or whatever clubs.
But probably you mean "refugee communities"? People want the refugee communities to make the effort to integrate into Australian society, then you want to stop them from playing sport with you. Nice.

By all means boycott teams that physically assault people, but not this.
Haven't you read the previous 7 pages, the team in question have a history of physical assault, so much so, one team won't even play them

"These types of teams" refers to "those teams" who are constantly involved in drama, violence and cheating

After all the pish you wrote when your team got done by Modbury I must say this post is a bit rich
Are you Bodo in disguise?
THE ORAKLE
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 3299
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:50 pm

Re: Answers please?

Post by THE ORAKLE »

if other clubs followed seafords lead and informed the league of their intentions before next season starts surely they would have to look at ways of changing things for the good of their competition. :roll:
User avatar
Kojima Haruna
Boot Polisher
Boot Polisher
Posts: 93
Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2013 4:06 am

Re: Answers please?

Post by Kojima Haruna »

THE ORAKLE wrote:if other clubs followed seafords lead
Perhaps should have made that decision before the season kicked off, not waited until you were out of contention.
At some stage things stop being cool
THE ORAKLE
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 3299
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:50 pm

Re: Answers please?

Post by THE ORAKLE »

Kojima Haruna wrote:
THE ORAKLE wrote:if other clubs followed seafords lead
Perhaps should have made that decision before the season kicked off, not waited until you were out of contention.
wrong. seaford was well in contention when the decision was made. iam now waiting for some idiot to post that its all seafords fault because we handed them 6 points and therefore contributed to that farcical last game match fix.
ExtraTime
Club Captain
Club Captain
Posts: 5223
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 9:11 pm
Been thanked: 17 times

Re: Answers please?

Post by ExtraTime »

THE ORAKLE wrote:
Kojima Haruna wrote:
THE ORAKLE wrote:if other clubs followed seafords lead
Perhaps should have made that decision before the season kicked off, not waited until you were out of contention.
wrong. seaford was well in contention when the decision was made. iam now waiting for some idiot to post that its all seafords fault because we handed them 6 points and therefore contributed to that farcical last game match fix.
wasnt the decision made the week before the Ghan game???

if so Seaford were 2-0-4 ... well in contention
User avatar
Hatchet Squad
Bench Warmer
Bench Warmer
Posts: 671
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 6:10 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Answers please?

Post by Hatchet Squad »

It was always on the cards. Spoke about weeks prior. Dave had reservations about playing them and left his decision to the week leading up. It was never going to be played
“Well done lad, but remember, you’re still only half as good as I was” – Dixie Dean to Bob Latchford after his 30th league goal in ’78




User avatar
Hatchet Squad
Bench Warmer
Bench Warmer
Posts: 671
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 6:10 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Answers please?

Post by Hatchet Squad »

Hatchet Squad wrote:It was always on the cards. Spoke about weeks prior. Dave had reservations about playing them and left his decision to the week leading up. It was never going to be played
And the same will probably happen next year when/if AYS field a team.
“Well done lad, but remember, you’re still only half as good as I was” – Dixie Dean to Bob Latchford after his 30th league goal in ’78




Post Reply