results in juniors finals

[knobby26]

Any results?

[Mullo]

14.3 Where a club may not have sufficient players to field a team in a semi-final or final due injury or illness, a club may request an exemption to the rule by submitting a request to FFSA outlining the reasons. If an exemption is granted, the club will only be permitted to move players up from a lower age group [b]unless otherwise determined by FFSA[/b].

So you can play a senior player in the U15 final if FFSA says yes.

It's right there in blue and white.

[irini]

Any final under 12 results yet?

[incognito]

Any final under 12 results yet?

Raiders 4-1 Adelaide city

[knobby26]

U 13`s??

[sufc13s]

Salisbury2 sth ade 3 aet

[irini]

Any further results?

[Domo Vina]

14's Adel City 3, Raiders2

[Cupboard1]

U/15 west adelaide 5 white city 0

[Armageddon]

Salisbury2 sth ade 3 aet

Weren't salisbury 2 nil up in 2nd half...good come back from Panthers if thats true...but finals are finals and anything can happen

[themessenger]

14.3 Where a club may not have sufficient players to field a team in a semi-final or final due injury or illness, a club may request an exemption to the rule by submitting a request to FFSA outlining the reasons. If an exemption is granted, the club will only be permitted to move players up from a lower age group unless otherwise determined by FFSA.

So you can play a senior player in the U15 final if FFSA says yes.

It's right there in blue and white.

So a club can put up such a convincing case that it needs to drop a player from 18s rather than bring one up from 14s, 13s or U12s to fill a spot in an Under 15s team junior cup final team?

Atrocious decision if this happened and one would have to ask why the FFSA agreed to this.

[juvefever]

14.3 Where a club may not have sufficient players to field a team in a semi-final or final due injury or illness, a club may request an exemption to the rule by submitting a request to FFSA outlining the reasons. If an exemption is granted, the club will only be permitted to move players up from a lower age group unless otherwise determined by FFSA.

So you can play a senior player in the U15 final if FFSA says yes.

It's right there in blue and white.

So a club can put up such a convincing case that it needs to drop a player from 18s rather than bring one up from 14s, 13s or U12s to fill a spot in an Under 15s team junior cup final team?

Atrocious decision if this happened and one would have to ask why the FFSA agreed to this.

I wasn't there......I thought both teams in the under 15 final wore blue and white, which team are you talking about?

[west adelaide]

14.3 Where a club may not have sufficient players to field a team in a semi-final or final due injury or illness, a club may request an exemption to the rule by submitting a request to FFSA outlining the reasons. If an exemption is granted, the club will only be permitted to move players up from a lower age group unless otherwise determined by FFSA.

So you can play a senior player in the U15 final if FFSA says yes.

It's right there in blue and white.

Oh sour grapes buddy.
By the way you have no idea.

[juvefever]

Well Done West Adelaide, from what I can see they are on top on Div 1 and are a fantastic football side. No disrespect to the other team but West Adelaide are the team to beat this year.

[auschris70]

U/16's

Playford 2 Metrostars 1

[agentofjustice]

Score update for U17's?

[deets]

2-0 enfield

[charlieadelaide]

Mullo wrote:

14.3 Where a club may not have sufficient players to field a team in a semi-final or final due injury or illness, a club may request an exemption to the rule by submitting a request to FFSA outlining the reasons. If an exemption is granted, the club will only be permitted to move players up from a lower age group unless otherwise determined by FFSA.

So you can play a senior player in the U15 final if FFSA says yes.

It's right there in blue and white.

You are a muppet mate, players can move up from a lower age group and not from Seniors.............West Adelaide are a very good side, White City on the other hand did very well to get to the final, albeit with a very checkered past, think yourselves lucky, I wonder how many of your under 15s we will see at the club in a few years, compared to West Adelaide, where I believe at least 5 of these players will be playing seniors if not overseas!!!!!!

[Stitch This]

compared to West Adelaide, where I believe at least 5 of these players have a chance of playing seniors if not overseas at some time in the future!!!!!!

Edited for a reality check

[Steve#4]

compared to West Adelaide, where I believe at least 5 of these players have a chance of playing seniors if not a slight chance/possibility of playing overseas at some time in the future!!!!!!

Edited for a reality check

Edited for a greater reality check.

[Waygtdwyl]

When it comes to editing you guys have got nothing on the post port thread.

[runcorn2adelaide]

Congrats to Playford
Was not there for the final today
But nice to see them come through on the day
Gotta love cup football

[Domo Vina]

compared to West Adelaide, where I believe at least 5 of these players have a chance of playing seniors if not a slight chance/possibility of playing overseas at some time in the future!!!!!!

Edited for a reality check

Edited for a greater reality check.

Hey Tasmania is overseas isn't it!!

[agentofjustice]

Hey Tasmania is overseas isn't it!![/quote]


Haha. What was the 17's game like? Reffing/playing wise?

[think quick]

"You are a muppet mate, players can move up from a lower age group and not from Seniors............." Quote

Ffsa rules page 24 of 39 point 2 d states: "once a player has played for a team within their club, the player may move up and play in a higher grade cup competition for their club but once they have played in the higher grade cup competition they are not permitted to move back down and play in a lower grade cup competition for their club"
....so having read that why do the FFSA still deem the senior cup competition and the junior cup competition separate and not enforce this rule?
As long as a first team, reserve or u18 player plays in the appropriate junior age group and plays one game before the semi final, they qualify for the juniors cup final, even if they are still involved in the senior cup. Fact.
Unfortunately for the regular team members in those junior teams, they are missing out on one of the highlights of the year and that is to play at Hindmarsh.
Maybe coaches should select and play players on the the squad selected for the year rather than the selfish need to win a cup final at all cost, especially when it will cost them the respect of their players....and even more so when they loose said cup final.

[juvefever]

This is the great debate.......do you play the regular squad or drop those higher. Neither is right or wrong at the end of the day I believe the cup is a different competition to that of the regular season and it is there to be won. I have no problem with players coming down if they are of the correct age, and neither should anyone else.....how is this an advantage, this player is of the appropriate age and therefore is also entitled to participate. If anyone thinks that the cup competition is there for development they are kidding themselves, it is a knockout tournament so the best team needs to be put on the park. There are a lot of things in football that are not fair, people need to get a life and get over it. In West Adelaide's case, they are a fantastic side and are on top of division one, for anyone to suggest that one player makes a five goal difference is stupid and ignorant. White City should take the advise they dished out in another thread when questioned about the appropriate age of their players and take it up with ffsa. WC beaten by a better team on the day and all of the other comments are ignorant and bordering disrespectful to the efforts of the West Adelaide boys.

[Ibelieve]

This is the great debate.......do you play the regular squad or drop those higher. Neither is right or wrong at the end of the day I believe the cup is a different competition to that of the regular season and it is there to be won. I have no problem with players coming down if they are of the correct age, and neither should anyone else.....how is this an advantage, this player is of the appropriate age and therefore is also entitled to participate. If anyone thinks that the cup competition is there for development they are kidding themselves, it is a knockout tournament so the best team needs to be put on the park. There are a lot of things in football that are not fair, people need to get a life and get over it. In West Adelaide's case, they are a fantastic side and are on top of division one, for anyone to suggest that one player makes a five goal difference is stupid and ignorant. White City should take the advise they dished out in another thread when questioned about the appropriate age of their players and take it up with ffsa. WC beaten by a better team on the day and all of the other comments are ignorant and bordering disrespectful to the efforts of the West Adelaide boys.

+1. You'll find last year para hills did the same in the 17's and playford did this year in the 16's. Senior players were played in ththose teams. Which is within the rules and good luck to those clubs. They've done great!

[Sacred Noodle]

I'd say most teams in the 15 and up age groups do the same .... Point the finger at WA but I can tell you now White City had at least one player from the U18 and reserves playing .. he's a good player and good boy and deserves to be their representing his club and age group .. so basically was a level playing field for both sides situation wise ..

[runcorn2adelaide]

I'd say most teams in the 15 and up age groups do the same .... Point the finger at WA but I can tell you now White City had at least one player from the U18 and reserves playing .. he's a good player and good boy and deserves to be their representing his club and age group .. so basically was a level playing field for both sides situation wise ..

+1

[juvefever]

Im told Metrostars Under 16's dropped their age relevant players from 17 and 18's, however, their under 15 side was their regular side. In the end as long as all players are the correct age, the better teams won on the day, lets congratulate them all and move on.