rd6 results

This forum is for discussion relating to junior football.

Moderators: John Cena, Forum Admins

SILENT P
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 3993
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 8:12 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: rd6 results

Post by SILENT P »

Baldrick wrote:
Raleigh wrote:Spanish or Dutch style will never catch is SA on for when it comes to the crunch coaches in SA are still selecting players who are fast and strong over players who although are bit slower have a natural ability to read the game of football (ie have a football brain). The faster players I find generally hold to the ball far too much and try to take on player after player ending up losing he ball (due to their speed and size they hog the ball) where as the slower and smarter player tries to find space to receive the ball and quickly passes the ball on to a supporting player offensively or defensively in order to maintain possession. Which one will you choose?
Spot on. I've seen it time and time again especially at STIC and FFSA trials.

Doesn't just happen at junior level unfortunately, also at seniors :(
STAY ON YOUR FEET
FK Partizan
Boot Polisher
Boot Polisher
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:34 pm

Re: rd6 results

Post by FK Partizan »

What some coaches don't realise is that kids develop physically at different times & the coaches that prefer the big & fast players will unfortunately produce redundant players later. No coach can deny that physically once the children get to 17+ this shallow advantage would be uncovered & no longer an advantage. What has he then ???
I was a toothpick with chicken legs as a junior 11- 13y/o & NOT fast just average ....... but had a growth spurt as a 14y/o & went on to win the state championships for multiple sprinting events. I would put my money on a player that learns how to cope with the kick & run types by outsmarting them with skill & awareness. Take it from me, I truly regret being played as one of those kick-fast wingers as my development STOPPED when a good defender would work out my strategy.
Please understand .... not bagging the big fast players, just that this should not be the top priority in development & being chosen specifically for this attribute is just bad coaching. If anything, these players should have extra attention on skills training to make them well rounded footballers for advancement as an adult player.
"At last England have appointed a manager who speaks English better than the players" - On the appointment of Sven-Goran Eriksson.
matty2323
Bench Warmer
Bench Warmer
Posts: 761
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 8:20 pm

Re: rd6 results

Post by matty2323 »

SILENT P wrote:
Baldrick wrote:
Raleigh wrote:Spanish or Dutch style will never catch is SA on for when it comes to the crunch coaches in SA are still selecting players who are fast and strong over players who although are bit slower have a natural ability to read the game of football (ie have a football brain). The faster players I find generally hold to the ball far too much and try to take on player after player ending up losing he ball (due to their speed and size they hog the ball) where as the slower and smarter player tries to find space to receive the ball and quickly passes the ball on to a supporting player offensively or defensively in order to maintain possession. Which one will you choose?
Spot on. I've seen it time and time again especially at STIC and FFSA trials.

Doesn't just happen at junior level unfortunately, also at seniors :(
Although i agree with a lot of what you're saying, to say strength and speed means you're a poor footballer in a sense is wrong. Its the coaches fault. You look at the best teams in the world, the best players, the likes of messi, ronaldo, bale, robben, ribery, gotze etc.. pace, strength and dribbling are all key facets of their game.

The problem is coaches pick players with these physical attributes, and instead of teaching them technical skills to base their game around and use the physical attributes as an asset, they focus their entire development on using speed and strength. 'long ball over the top, out muscle/sprint the defender, score a goal'... but what happens when you cant out muscle/sprint the defender? do you have the intelligence, technique, skill to turn out, keep the ball etc? no. why? because you've never been taught.

Pace and strength are huge assets to have, but you still need a technical base. This technical base shouldn't have anything to do with the physical attributes, it should evolve around ball mastery and a tactical understanding of the game. Im an advocate of passing football, one/two touch football. I see alot of people call players who dribble 'hogs'. I dont like this. I encourage my kids to dribble. If you have the confidence with the ball at your feet to beat a player 1v1 then this is a huge asset. As coaches, we shouldn't discourage dribbling or running with the ball, rather teach the kids decision making. back to goal, opponent up your ass, then ofcourse pass. but if you receive it on a half turn facing forward with space to drive into, then by all means travel with it. Kids take what coaches say very literally, so its important to encourage flair and creativity otherwise you will be stuck with 11 players who know how to pass a ball, but all they can do is pass backwards or sideways. Nothing breaks the lines like a Central midfielder ghosting past his opponent and driving into the final third (yaya toure).
The moyesiah
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 366
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:38 am

Re: rd6 results

Post by The moyesiah »

Raleigh wrote:Spanish or Dutch style will never catch is SA on for when it comes to the crunch coaches in SA are still selecting players who are fast and strong over players who although are bit slower have a natural ability to read the game of football (ie have a football brain). The faster players I find generally hold to the ball far too much and try to take on player after player ending up losing he ball (due to their speed and size they hog the ball) where as the slower and smarter player tries to find space to receive the ball and quickly passes the ball on to a supporting player offensively or defensively in order to maintain possession. Which one will you choose?

Some clubs have no choice and they are lucky to get 15 players, let alone hope they can play a technical, head smart game. Putting us in the same basket as Europe is simply a joke, not because we can't do it, but because many clubs don't have the players to do it. Let's be honest these European clubs are not even looking at 80% of the players we suit up every Sunday within the JPL from U12-U17. Every club would love to follow this or that but sadly you just can't with the players some clubs have. However even the clubs that do have these numbers, don't do it either. Some struggle to bring shin pads or socks, let alone understanding drills, so it's not surprising many teams play what they can.
User avatar
DUKE BLUE
Bench Warmer
Bench Warmer
Posts: 506
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 12:25 am

Re: rd6 results

Post by DUKE BLUE »

Teach them how to play….who cares what they look like.

Big – Gullit
Small – Messi
Fat – Maradonna
Fast – Cannigia
Fragile – Valderama
FK Partizan
Boot Polisher
Boot Polisher
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:34 pm

Re: rd6 results

Post by FK Partizan »

DUKE BLUE wrote:Teach them how to play….who cares what they look like.

Big – Gullit
Small – Messi
Fat – Maradonna
Fast – Cannigia
Fragile – Valderama

+1
"At last England have appointed a manager who speaks English better than the players" - On the appointment of Sven-Goran Eriksson.
Post Reply