Daily Mail wrote:Dave Bowman, chairman of the supporters’ club Greater Manchester branch, said he was stepping down from his position and would not be returning to the stadium while Di Canio was in charge.
Mr Bowman, a Sunderland fan since his first game in 1958 and season ticket holder since the Stadium of Light opened in 1997, believes Short may not understand the deep feelings of some supporters.
He said: `It feels like a bereavement. The backbone of the support is working class and this is an appalling appointment.
'How can we have a Nelson Mandela Day at the stadium and the following day appoint a self-confessed fascist with, I believe, a Mussolini tattoo? It is hypocrisy.’
Di Canio for the Mackems
Moderators: BillShankly, arxidi, Judge Judy, Forum Admins
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 19866
- Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:55 am
- Been thanked: 140 times
Di Canio for the Mackems
Good or bad? Can't believe Shorty appointed him but I love him, he brings a bit of fun and controversy to the league.
"The game is about glory, doing things in style and with a flourish, going out and beating the other lot, not waiting for them to die of boredom."
Danny Blanchflower
Danny Blanchflower
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Di Canio for the Mackems
di canio has already made his mark and changed their nickname to the "WHITE CATS".
Oh and Nelson Mandella day
Oh and Nelson Mandella day
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1242
- Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 10:42 am
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Di Canio for the Mackems
God is an Englishman wrote:apparently, he's going to change the formation to 11 far right wingers
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Di Canio for the Mackems
"So Paolo, do you think there's going to be a language barrier problem getting your tactical messages across?".
"Probably," replied Di Canio. "But if I speak English slowly and surely, hopefully these weird talking Mackems will understand what the fuck I'm saying."
"Probably," replied Di Canio. "But if I speak English slowly and surely, hopefully these weird talking Mackems will understand what the fuck I'm saying."
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 713
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 5:31 pm
Re: Di Canio for the Mackems
Didn't see it coming; but it was justified. Short deserves better than where we are of the investment he's made over the past two windows.DOC wrote:cannot believe MON was sacked
Di Canio wouldn't be my first choice, but he'll be good for a laugh and will play good football.
Re: Di Canio for the Mackems
Martin o Neil = one of the most over rated coaches in world football. His teams play shit football and lack any style or clear game plan .
" I used to go Missing a lot- Miss Canada, Miss United Kingdom, Miss Germany." George Best
Re: Di Canio for the Mackems
He did wonders at Leicester Celtic and villa, you are well off the mark hereGa Pala wrote:Martin o Neil = one of the most over rated coaches in world football. His teams play cabernet football and lack any style or clear game plan .
Re: Di Canio for the Mackems
But why now? A 1 nil loss to united with a token bramble own goal is an acceptable result considering, a loss to reading would have it a lot more justifiedElSeano wrote:Didn't see it coming; but it was justified. Short deserves better than where we are of the investment he's made over the past two windows.DOC wrote:cannot believe MON was sacked
Di Canio wouldn't be my first choice, but he'll be good for a laugh and will play good football.
Re: Di Canio for the Mackems
C'mon DOC. Take them rose sunnies off will ya. His side sits 5th bottom and only a solitary point from the drop. And you are going to say honestly it's not justified.......DOC wrote:But why now? A 1 nil loss to united with a token bramble own goal is an acceptable result considering, a loss to reading would have it a lot more justifiedElSeano wrote:Didn't see it coming; but it was justified. Short deserves better than where we are of the investment he's made over the past two windows.DOC wrote:cannot believe MON was sacked
Di Canio wouldn't be my first choice, but he'll be good for a laugh and will play good football.
COLOSSUS wrote:Let me guess, ive got no balls
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Di Canio for the Mackems
Chaos wrote:C'mon DOC. Take them rose sunnies off will ya. His side sits 5th bottom and only a solitary point from the drop. And you are going to say honestly it's not justified.......
His question is valid though. Why now?
Are man u that poor a side that you sack someone for losing to them.
Obviously, he was sacked before this game and his replacement found, they jsut hadn't told him.
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 2850
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:40 am
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Di Canio for the Mackems
As a neutral, the idea of Paolo DiCanio being a premier league manager certainly bodes well for entertainment!
It's all in the Delivery!
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1652
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 5:10 pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Di Canio for the Mackems
Absolutely!Brian the Postman wrote:As a neutral, the idea of Paolo DiCanio being a premier league manager certainly bodes well for entertainment!
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Di Canio for the Mackems
he should have been banned for life for his incident with Paul Alcock. It's a disgrace this man is allowed anything to do with football anymore.
- El Pibe D'Oro
- Club Captain
- Posts: 6172
- Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 1:38 pm
Re: Di Canio for the Mackems
Nice tryGod is an Englishman wrote:he should have been banned for life for his incident with Paul Alcock. It's a disgrace this man is allowed anything to do with football anymore.
- Outlaw 2.0
- Star Player
- Posts: 4343
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 1:57 pm
Re: Di Canio for the Mackems
No wins in the last 8.......God is an Englishman wrote:Chaos wrote:C'mon DOC. Take them rose sunnies off will ya. His side sits 5th bottom and only a solitary point from the drop. And you are going to say honestly it's not justified.......
His question is valid though. Why now?
Are man u that poor a side that you sack someone for losing to them.
Obviously, he was sacked before this game and his replacement found, they jsut hadn't told him.
This includes losses to the likes of; Reading, QPR and a draw with Norwich..... All games in my opinion we should have won. MO'N is a great manager and I am sad to see him go, he unfortunately didn't work out. As a Sunderland fan I will move on and back Di Canio with the same enthusiasm I did when MO'N took over from Steve Bruce.
The cattle are there, Larsson Gardner Fletcher Sess. Rose Mignolet can all play football, I don't care if Sunderland appointed a chain smoking hamster with one leg and a bad French accent that no one could understand....... As long as we are in the top flight next year.
HA'WAY THE LADS
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Di Canio for the Mackems
what do you mean? Push a ref like that and you would get a lifetime ban if you did that in an amateur league in England, why didn't he get the same?El Pibe D'Oro wrote:Nice tryGod is an Englishman wrote:he should have been banned for life for his incident with Paul Alcock. It's a disgrace this man is allowed anything to do with football anymore.
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 19866
- Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:55 am
- Been thanked: 140 times
Re: Di Canio for the Mackems
Hardly touched him, Alcock has a balance problem.God is an Englishman wrote:what do you mean? Push a ref like that and you would get a lifetime ban if you did that in an amateur league in England, why didn't he get the same?El Pibe D'Oro wrote:Nice tryGod is an Englishman wrote:he should have been banned for life for his incident with Paul Alcock. It's a disgrace this man is allowed anything to do with football anymore.
"The game is about glory, doing things in style and with a flourish, going out and beating the other lot, not waiting for them to die of boredom."
Danny Blanchflower
Danny Blanchflower
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Di Canio for the Mackems
Hardly touched him, Alcock has a balance problem.[/quote]Nice One Cyril wrote: what do you mean? Push a ref like that and you would get a lifetime ban if you did that in an amateur league in England, why didn't he get the same?
He put his hands on the ref. GUILTY!!
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 19866
- Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:55 am
- Been thanked: 140 times
Re: Di Canio for the Mackems
God is an Englishman wrote:Hardly touched him, Alcock has a balance problem.Nice One Cyril wrote: what do you mean? Push a ref like that and you would get a lifetime ban if you did that in an amateur league in England, why didn't he get the same?
He put his hands on the ref. GUILTY!![/quote]
Not at all, saw the ref was a bit unsteady then, as the ref looked like falling, tried to grab him to help him stay upright.
"The game is about glory, doing things in style and with a flourish, going out and beating the other lot, not waiting for them to die of boredom."
Danny Blanchflower
Danny Blanchflower
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Di Canio for the Mackems
Nice One Cyril wrote:Not at all, saw the ref was a bit unsteady then, as the ref looked like falling, tried to grab him to help him stay upright.
- Bodø's Publicist
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:09 pm
Re: Di Canio for the Mackems
There's no degree to touching an official. Either you do it or you don't. di canio did, end of.Nice One Cyril wrote:Hardly touched him, Alcock has a balance problem.
R.I.P
Stuff And Stuff About Stuff
Stuff And Stuff About Stuff
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1242
- Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 10:42 am
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Di Canio for the Mackems
So punching a ref is the same as a love tap?Bodø's Publicist wrote:There's no degree to touching an official. Either you do it or you don't. di canio did, end of.Nice One Cyril wrote:Hardly touched him, Alcock has a balance problem.
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 19866
- Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:55 am
- Been thanked: 140 times
Re: Di Canio for the Mackems
WhooshBodø's Publicist wrote:There's no degree to touching an official. Either you do it or you don't. di canio did, end of.Nice One Cyril wrote:Hardly touched him, Alcock has a balance problem.
"The game is about glory, doing things in style and with a flourish, going out and beating the other lot, not waiting for them to die of boredom."
Danny Blanchflower
Danny Blanchflower
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Di Canio for the Mackems
kevinkeegan wrote:So punching a ref is the same as a love tap?Bodø's Publicist wrote:There's no degree to touching an official. Either you do it or you don't. di canio did, end of.Nice One Cyril wrote:Hardly touched him, Alcock has a balance problem.
both would carry a lifetime ban in the lower leagues in England.
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1242
- Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 10:42 am
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Di Canio for the Mackems
How he only got yellow for that I will never know.pernunz wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGWIMr0c1Mc
Right in the bails!
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 713
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 5:31 pm
Re: Di Canio for the Mackems
+1Outlaw 2.0 wrote:No wins in the last 8.......God is an Englishman wrote:Chaos wrote:C'mon DOC. Take them rose sunnies off will ya. His side sits 5th bottom and only a solitary point from the drop. And you are going to say honestly it's not justified.......
His question is valid though. Why now?
Are man u that poor a side that you sack someone for losing to them.
Obviously, he was sacked before this game and his replacement found, they jsut hadn't told him.
This includes losses to the likes of; Reading, QPR and a draw with Norwich..... All games in my opinion we should have won. MO'N is a great manager and I am sad to see him go, he unfortunately didn't work out. As a Sunderland fan I will move on and back Di Canio with the same enthusiasm I did when MO'N took over from Steve Bruce.
The cattle are there, Larsson Gardner Fletcher Sess. Rose Mignolet can all play football, I don't care if Sunderland appointed a chain smoking hamster with one leg and a bad French accent that no one could understand....... As long as we are in the top flight next year.
- Bodø's Publicist
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:09 pm
Re: Di Canio for the Mackems
Woosh unwarranted.Nice One Cyril wrote:WhooshBodø's Publicist wrote:There's no degree to touching an official. Either you do it or you don't. di canio did, end of.Nice One Cyril wrote:Hardly touched him, Alcock has a balance problem.
I am perfectly well aware of what you were getting at.
R.I.P
Stuff And Stuff About Stuff
Stuff And Stuff About Stuff