what an interesting life you must lead

how many of above actually played today?
Moderators: Randoman, Ernie Cooksey, Forum Admins
Only made 150% of their opponents score so far this innings.Red-4-Life wrote:Making 2nd spot in the Shield hard as well.....
It's well within the rules, they saught an experienced player who could captain the side to better 4 day form, I have no issues that he's a saffarulebritannia wrote:the ship has been ably steered by a South African
Red-4-Life wrote:52 runs to win, 9 wickets in hand
Looks like Vic may beat Qld, if not it'll be a draw Both results favour SA.
Been plenty of OS players to play Shield cricket.DOC wrote:It's well within the rules, they saught an experienced player who could captain the side to better 4 day form, I have no issues that he's a saffarulebritannia wrote:the ship has been ably steered by a South African
who asked whether you had any issues? thats well establishedDOC wrote:It's well within the rules, they saught an experienced player who could captain the side to better 4 day form, I have no issues that he's a saffarulebritannia wrote:the ship has been ably steered by a South African
2 out of 3 played for South AustraliaBacon888 wrote:Been plenty of OS players to play Shield cricket.DOC wrote:It's well within the rules, they saught an experienced player who could captain the side to better 4 day form, I have no issues that he's a saffarulebritannia wrote:the ship has been ably steered by a South African
Botham
Sobers
Garner
Add Viv Richards (Qld), Barry Richards, Gladstone Small, Phil DeFreitas...........many more but all long ago.Bacon888 wrote:Been plenty of OS players to play Shield cricket.DOC wrote:It's well within the rules, they saught an experienced player who could captain the side to better 4 day form, I have no issues that he's a saffarulebritannia wrote:the ship has been ably steered by a South African
Botham
Sobers
Garner
Which has changed about 4 times in one thread and now gone full circle.rulebritannia wrote:just highlights my point further
who was the last one?Bacon888 wrote:This has a little relevance, because it's about developing.
KoK talked about what clubs have produced the most Test Cricketers.
Kerry O'Keeffe @kokeeffe49
Baggy green podium=
1. Western Suburbs dcc Sydney
2. South Melbourne dcc Melbourne
3. St George dcc Sydney
4 Glenelg dcc Adelaide
So, it shows that Glenelg can pump out good players. Should be a feeder team to the Redbacks more.
Probably like Dehli United, in India. They haven't produced ANY Australian players.rulebritannia wrote:who was the last one?Bacon888 wrote:This has a little relevance, because it's about developing.
KoK talked about what clubs have produced the most Test Cricketers.
Kerry O'Keeffe @kokeeffe49
Baggy green podium=
1. Western Suburbs dcc Sydney
2. South Melbourne dcc Melbourne
3. St George dcc Sydney
4 Glenelg dcc Adelaide
So, it shows that Glenelg can pump out good players. Should be a feeder team to the Redbacks more.
who was the last Glenelg player that played tests for Australia?Bacon888 wrote:Probably like Dehli United, in India. They haven't produced ANY Australian players.rulebritannia wrote:who was the last one?Bacon888 wrote:This has a little relevance, because it's about developing.
KoK talked about what clubs have produced the most Test Cricketers.
Kerry O'Keeffe @kokeeffe49
Baggy green podium=
1. Western Suburbs dcc Sydney
2. South Melbourne dcc Melbourne
3. St George dcc Sydney
4 Glenelg dcc Adelaide
So, it shows that Glenelg can pump out good players. Should be a feeder team to the Redbacks more.
I don't understand your question.
It's not about playing for Australia, it's about the Redbacks.rulebritannia wrote:who was the last Glenelg player that played tests for Australia?Bacon888 wrote:Probably like Dehli United, in India. They haven't produced ANY Australian players.rulebritannia wrote:
who was the last one?
I don't understand your question.
why dont you stay on topic??Bacon888 wrote: It's not about playing for Australia, it's about the Redbacks.
Keep on topic.
Bacon888 wrote:This has a little relevance, because it's about developing.
KoK talked about what clubs have produced the most Test Cricketers.
Kerry O'Keeffe @kokeeffe49
Baggy green podium=
1. Western Suburbs dcc Sydney
2. South Melbourne dcc Melbourne
3. St George dcc Sydney
4 Glenelg dcc Adelaide
So, it shows that Glenelg can pump out good players. Should be a feeder team to the Redbacks more.
Notice the last line... I'm suggesting Glenelg produces players for the Redbacks. Not the Test side. So the last Test player is irrelevant.rulebritannia wrote:why dont you stay on topic??Bacon888 wrote: It's not about playing for Australia, it's about the Redbacks.
Keep on topic.
Bacon888 wrote:This has a little relevance, because it's about developing.
KoK talked about what clubs have produced the most Test Cricketers.
Kerry O'Keeffe @kokeeffe49
Baggy green podium=
1. Western Suburbs dcc Sydney
2. South Melbourne dcc Melbourne
3. St George dcc Sydney
4 Glenelg dcc Adelaide
So, it shows that Glenelg can pump out good players. Should be a feeder team to the Redbacks more.
you cannot be seriousBacon888 wrote:Notice the last line... I'm suggesting Glenelg produces players for the Redbacks. Not the Test side. So the last Test player is irrelevant.rulebritannia wrote:why dont you stay on topic??Bacon888 wrote: It's not about playing for Australia, it's about the Redbacks.
Keep on topic.
Bacon888 wrote:This has a little relevance, because it's about developing.
KoK talked about what clubs have produced the most Test Cricketers.
Kerry O'Keeffe @kokeeffe49
Baggy green podium=
1. Western Suburbs dcc Sydney
2. South Melbourne dcc Melbourne
3. St George dcc Sydney
4 Glenelg dcc Adelaide
So, it shows that Glenelg can pump out good players. Should be a feeder team to the Redbacks more.
Big bash v Brisbane last ball lossrulebritannia wrote:they choked again today. i think they've choked in every competition this season
WA put on 69 for last wicket to win by 1 wicket
Nah, just avoiding the final altogether. Success it too mainstreamkevinkeegan wrote:Avoiding a glenelg oval shield final -Adelaide oval unavailable
no, same thing happened in both innings. Big last wicket stands in both inns won WA the matchkevinkeegan wrote:Were wa really 9 down still needing 60 odd or did someone get confused with first inn