Moderators: BillShankly, arxidi, Judge Judy, Forum Admins
El Pibe D'Oro wrote:Shut up will ya peanut.DAM wrote:more like $$$$ payments!
how any Juve supporter can be celebrating that "stolen" win in catania is shameful!
serie A refs are a massive joke!!!!
Please just for once. You have no idea what you are talking about, although yes it was a shocking decision.
DAM wrote:El Pibe D'Oro wrote:Shut up will ya peanut.DAM wrote:more like $$$$ payments!
how any Juve supporter can be celebrating that "stolen" win in catania is shameful!
serie A refs are a massive joke!!!!
Please just for once. You have no idea what you are talking about, although yes it was a shocking decision.
really?
I have no idea, yet u agree with me???
feg off u
El Pibe D'Oro wrote:Shut up will ya peanut.DAM wrote:more like $$$$ payments!
how any Juve supporter can be celebrating that "stolen" win in catania is shameful!
serie A refs are a massive joke!!!!
Please just for once. You have no idea what you are talking about, although yes it was a shocking decision.
BMMM wrote:El Pibe D'Oro wrote:Shut up will ya peanut.DAM wrote:more like $$$$ payments!
how any Juve supporter can be celebrating that "stolen" win in catania is shameful!
serie A refs are a massive joke!!!!
Please just for once. You have no idea what you are talking about, although yes it was a shocking decision.
Hey F**k face, let me ask you this:
No doubt in the world that you are celebrating Man. Utd's victory over Chealsea, and no doubt you are celebrating Adelaide Utd's victory over Wellington, WHY???
Both of your "teams" were awarded goals that were clearly offside on the weekend, yet you have a ridiculous dig at Juve and their supporters???
How was Juve's goal any different to Man. Utd's and Adelaide Utd's ?????
You strangely forget how a few weeks ago a referee's error went in Napoli's favour when you were awarded a penalty for a foul outside the box the resulting pen was the only goal of the game. Were you not celebrating a "stolen" win on that occasion???
(I bet you didn't even watch the game anyway, I bet you don't even know which game I'm talking about)
You are the biggest Hippocrite and you have absolutely no idea!
No one likes you, including your own fellow supporters, and what you say is complete immature bulls**t!!!
Every time you touch that keyboard you look like more and more of an Idiot, but oh well, more for us to laugh at I guess.
C'mon E P D'O, It was a very dubious decision, certainly not stonewall and you know it. Initial contact was definitely made outside of the box mate!El Pibe D'Oro wrote:BMMM let it go, but I will correct you on the Napoli vs Sampdoria, you looked at the Juventus camera angle, it was a stonewall penalty.
DAM wrote:Ooops, sorry. I dropped that shiraz I was about to give!
BMMM wrote:DAM wrote:Ooops, sorry. I dropped that shiraz I was about to give!
Oh, how convenient for you!!!
Like I said, maturity level of a 3 year old!
Goodbye loser!
BAGGIO 15 wrote:Its time for video access to allowed for the 4th official.
If they saw a replay and advised the ref these incidents would be reduced.
Best when a ball hits the back of the net and offside was a possibility.
+1God is an Englishman wrote:BAGGIO 15 wrote:Its time for video access to allowed for the 4th official.
If they saw a replay and advised the ref these incidents would be reduced.
Best when a ball hits the back of the net and offside was a possibility.
where do you stop with this, every decision can affect a game. Give the throw in the wrong way, offside given or not given, free kick given or not given. The game will end up like aussie rules or american football with it's constant stop/start, stop/start.
We have travel packages available for anyone who is interested.dudley wrote:who is going to sydneys next home game against the reds??????
BAGGIO 15 wrote:The only place I can see it working is when a goal is scored and the game stops anyway.
All other times would cause to much stopping and starting.
So the problem is would only occur in Italy.God is an Englishman wrote:BAGGIO 15 wrote:The only place I can see it working is when a goal is scored and the game stops anyway.
All other times would cause to much stopping and starting.
Can you imagine stopping the game for a vide replay every time there was a "foul". The Seria a would have to bring forward it's game by a day to make sure people could go to work on Monday morning.
BAGGIO 15 wrote:So the problem is would only occur in Italy.God is an Englishman wrote:BAGGIO 15 wrote:The only place I can see it working is when a goal is scored and the game stops anyway.
All other times would cause to much stopping and starting.
Can you imagine stopping the game for a vide replay every time there was a "foul". The Seria a would have to bring forward it's game by a day to make sure people could go to work on Monday morning.
Either stirring or simply naive.
When's the last time you sat through 90 minutes of Serie A?God is an Englishman wrote:BAGGIO 15 wrote:The only place I can see it working is when a goal is scored and the game stops anyway.
All other times would cause to much stopping and starting.
Can you imagine stopping the game for a vide replay every time there was a "foul". The Seria a would have to bring forward it's game by a day to make sure people could go to work on Monday morning.
I keep trying but I fall asleep.getborn wrote:When's the last time you sat through 90 minutes of Serie A?God is an Englishman wrote:BAGGIO 15 wrote:The only place I can see it working is when a goal is scored and the game stops anyway.
All other times would cause to much stopping and starting.
Can you imagine stopping the game for a vide replay every time there was a "foul". The Seria a would have to bring forward it's game by a day to make sure people could go to work on Monday morning.
