Los Blanco14 wrote:this is an absolute joke. Petros (who coaches the refs) went around and took photos of players shin pads yesterday at b27
good job macedonia weren"t playing, they would have sued for taking photos of them.
Moderators: BillShankly, John Cena, swannsong, Forum Admins
Los Blanco14 wrote:this is an absolute joke. Petros (who coaches the refs) went around and took photos of players shin pads yesterday at b27
Who is confused by these? If you are then you shouldn't be playing the game.Caretaker Coach wrote:so they have confused people with the offside rule, slide tackle rule, handball rule, and now, they want to add the shin pad rule to that as well ?
I would say that just about every game you go to there are people who dispute all of the above, do they not ?God is an Englishman wrote:Who is confused by these? If you are then you shouldn't be playing the game.Caretaker Coach wrote:so they have confused people with the offside rule, slide tackle rule, handball rule, and now, they want to add the shin pad rule to that as well ?
The General wrote:I would say that just about every game you go to there are people who dispute all of the above, do they not ?God is an Englishman wrote:Who is confused by these? If you are then you shouldn't be playing the game.Caretaker Coach wrote:so they have confused people with the offside rule, slide tackle rule, handball rule, and now, they want to add the shin pad rule to that as well ?
Noooooooo, You?.....God is an Englishman wrote:
I fully understand the handball law, yet I was booked for dissent on saturday for questioning the decision. I was not confused by the law, the ref got it wrong.
I only got 2 bookings all of last year I'll have you know.Franco# wrote:Noooooooo, You?.....God is an Englishman wrote:
I fully understand the handball law, yet I was booked for dissent on saturday for questioning the decision. I was not confused by the law, the ref got it wrong.![]()
God is an Englishman wrote:I only got 2 bookings all of last year I'll have you know.Franco# wrote:Noooooooo, You?.....God is an Englishman wrote:
I fully understand the handball law, yet I was booked for dissent on saturday for questioning the decision. I was not confused by the law, the ref got it wrong.![]()
from what i hear (and i stress it was hearsay) it is an insurance issue (which type not sure??? league or personal?)... players will not be covered if they were to break a leg and the shin pad was not of correct size (and yes we all know and have witnessed... when a leg has been broken, irrespective of the size of the shin pad it would not have made a difference).penalty wrote:Spoke to Petros, he took the photo for his next caoching presentation . I saw the photo and the player had his siocks down, and shin pads and socks only covouredabout 6 to 10 centremeters abouve ankle.
He is not using the photo to report the player or referee, but wanted to have some examples for his power point presentation. He also told me that it is up to the discresion of the referee if the player can play or not. It is only a guid as to what is reasonable degree of protection.
If that was really the case it would be a directive for the league not the refs... This is simply a case of referees placing importance on the unimportant whilst missing the real issues facing refereeing...the REAL one wrote:from what i hear (and i stress it was hearsay) it is an insurance issue (which type not sure??? league or personal?)... players will not be covered if they were to break a leg and the shin pad was not of correct size (and yes we all know and have witnessed... when a leg has been broken, irrespective of the size of the shin pad it would not have made a difference).penalty wrote:Spoke to Petros, he took the photo for his next caoching presentation . I saw the photo and the player had his siocks down, and shin pads and socks only covouredabout 6 to 10 centremeters abouve ankle.
He is not using the photo to report the player or referee, but wanted to have some examples for his power point presentation. He also told me that it is up to the discresion of the referee if the player can play or not. It is only a guid as to what is reasonable degree of protection.
the REAL one wrote:from what i hear (and i stress it was hearsay) it is an insurance issue (which type not sure??? league or personal?)... players will not be covered if they were to break a leg and the shin pad was not of correct size (and yes we all know and have witnessed... when a leg has been broken, irrespective of the size of the shin pad it would not have made a difference).
rooboy1986 wrote:If that was really the case it would be a directive for the league not the refs... This is simply a case of referees placing importance on the unimportant whilst missing the real issues facing refereeing...
I see refs choosing to enforce laws that are black and white such as undershorts and being pedantic to show self importance Pre game to really cover up their own inadequecies when it comes to the really important stuff.. E.g fitness, foul identification, positioning, player management, thorough knowledge of lotg etc.. I say concentrate more on these things and don't sweat the small stuff...God is an Englishman wrote:rooboy1986 wrote:If that was really the case it would be a directive for the league not the refs... This is simply a case of referees placing importance on the unimportant whilst missing the real issues facing refereeing...
I disagree with that. Refs do not choose what laws they are going to poliuce and what they aren't. The laws state that shin pads must have adequate protection, they state that undershorts must be the same colour. These are simple things that are pretty hard to get wrong. Wrong decisions will be made on the pitch (just like players make many wrong decisions in a game), but you start by controlling what you can control then do your best to control what you can't.
Did he check your shin pads quality, size, type, coverage etc?Bacon888 wrote:When I was a kid, and the referee made us line up to check the studs on the boots, I never thought it was pedantic, or put me offside if I was made to change boots etc....
There are rules to be followed, and you just get on with it. If you wanna break the rules, and get caught, that's your problem.
Ante up and buy a whistle, that will fix em...rooboy1986 wrote:Yeah ... shiraz pioneers in the saasra...
Learn to ref first is all I am saying...
Yeah... I probably will... I'd first need assurance that I am not going to be marked down heavily for not getting players to tuck their shirts in or wearing plastic wristbands etc. and be marked up for all the other more important ticket items like positioning, fitness, LOTG, foul identification etc...Franco# wrote:Ante up and buy a whistle, that will fix em...rooboy1986 wrote:Yeah ... shiraz pioneers in the saasra...
Learn to ref first is all I am saying...
I don't see it as a rubbish rule, players that say they are to uncomfortable is more mental than actual.rooboy1986 wrote:Yeah... I probably will... I'd first need assurance that I am not going to be marked down heavily for not getting players to tuck their shirts in or wearing plastic wristbands etc. and be marked up for all the other more important ticket items like positioning, fitness, LOTG, foul identification etc...Franco# wrote:Ante up and buy a whistle, that will fix em...rooboy1986 wrote:Yeah ... shiraz pioneers in the saasra...
Learn to ref first is all I am saying...
I believe quite strongly that the way in which they are going about things is just plain wrong... Making more trouble for themselves... In particular this fabricated shin pad rule... Never ever heard such rubbish in my life...
rooboy1986 wrote:Yeah... I probably will... I'd first need assurance that I am not going to be marked down heavily for not getting players to tuck their shirts in or wearing plastic wristbands etc. and be marked up for all the other more important ticket items like positioning, fitness, LOTG, foul identification etc...Franco# wrote:Ante up and buy a whistle, that will fix em...rooboy1986 wrote:Yeah ... shiraz pioneers in the saasra...
Learn to ref first is all I am saying...
I believe quite strongly that the way in which they are going about things is just plain wrong... Making more trouble for themselves... In particular this fabricated shin pad rule... Never ever heard such rubbish in my life...
robinfriday10 wrote:just think rooboy you could progress to.....................???????
rooboy1986 wrote:robinfriday10 wrote:just think rooboy you could progress to.....................???????
There's always FIFA!!!
+1. Not a well thought out explanation of what is acceptable.Bacon888 wrote:http://saasra.wikispaces.com/file/view/ ... 2-1012.pdf
Even their example doesn't qualify.. There's at least 7cm from this guy's shinpad to his knee.